The (Possible) Future of International Spam Laws

Posted by J.D. Falk on

After more than a decade of fits and starts, fear and doubt, lies and lobbying, legislative attention towards spam now seems to arrive in regular waves. Our friend Dennis Dayman reports on deliverability.com that a new law has taken effect in Israel, requiring (in short) opt-in — and so according to the International Herald Tribune, Israeli marketers were rushing to re-confirm questionable subscriptions before the deadline this past Monday. In Canada, Internet law expert Michael Geist lambasted his government for continuing to fail to pass any anti-spam legislation, four years after he and the National Task Force on Spam — which also included our own Neil Schwartzman — strongly urged them to take immediate action. And this week at the Internet Governance Forum in Hyderabad, I’ve heard representatives from more than a dozen governments from all over the world discussing not whether “cyber crime” legislation is necessary, but rather how it should be formulated to fit their local legal standards and culture.

Even in the United States, with both foes and supporters of the incoming administration waiting to learn what President Obama and his staff will do, there are clear signs that consumer protection may once again be a major part of the American political landscape. The libertarian-leaning Technology Liberation Front argues convincingly that privacy will be among the first things addressed, likely including how personal information is collected, stored, and shared. And for a peek into how technology policy may be formulated in the new White House, there’s Doc Searls’s recent article in Linux Journal explaining how the open source community — from whence came the anti-spam community — contributed in novel and interesting ways to Barack Obama’s successful campaign.

The confluence of market forces, industry self-regulation, and community activism has led us to where we are today, with an ever-widening gap between the criminal spammers and legitimate senders. Intelligently crafted legislation, backed by a level of technical understanding and market knowledge that goes far beyond “it’s a series of tubes,” may be the necessary next step along the path towards a more trustworthy and reliable email ecosystem.


Popular this Month

 Video in Email: Is It Right For Your Business? (Part 1)

Video in Email: Is It Right For Your Business? (Part 1)

Video in email is nothing new. Marketers have been using some form of video...

Read More

 [New Research] Are These Hidden Metrics Harming Your Deliverability?

[New Research] Are These Hidden Metrics Harming Your Deliverability?

Reaching the inbox is not as simple as hitting send. Once a message is...

Read More

 What Job Is Your Subscriber Hiring Your Email To Do?

What Job Is Your Subscriber Hiring Your Email To Do?

Over the last 16 years, I’ve worked as a product manager, run product...

Read More

Author Image

About J.D. Falk

Author Archive

Stay up to date

Enter your name and email address below to subscribe to our mailing list.

Your browser is out of date.
For a better Return Path experience, click a link below to get the latest version.